■ Proper Prenup Protects Estate:
W and H signed a prenup agreement. Both were
represented by counsel, engaged in discovery, and schedules of assets,
liabilities and income tax return were attached to the agreement. H and W
married July 8, 2003. H died March 9, 2008. On March 31, 2008 W filed a caveat
to H's will. A caveat is a challenge that the will should not be admitted.
Issue - should the caveat be rejected and the will accepted, or should the
prenuptial agreement be rejected and W be permitted to take a surviving
spouse's elective share under N.J.S.A. 3B:8-1 to -19. An elective share is a
minimum inheritance a surviving spouse is entitled to by law, regardless of a
will, if this right was not properly waived. W claimed, among other things that
the agreed payments were made to her under a trust instead of under the will as
required. The court found no practical difference. The court noted that the
law, N.J.S.A. 37:2-38, places the burden of proof to set aside a prenup on the
party alleging the agreement to be unenforceable and that burden must be met by
clear and convincing evidence. A challenge can succeed on equitable
considerations, such as unconscionability, failure to disclose, etc. In the
matter of the estate of Donald Towbin, Deceased, Sup Ct NJ, App Div, Docket No.
A-0161-08T30161-08T3, March 16, 2009.
■ Real Estate Tax Audits: